Nicklinson-Lamb euthanasia ruling welcomed but ‘Martin’ assisted suicide ruling carries danger for disabled people

Home / Press Releases / Nicklinson-Lamb euthanasia ruling welcomed but ‘Martin’ assisted suicide ruling carries danger for disabled people

London, 31 July 2013: SPUC Pro-Life www.spuc.org.uk has welcomed the fact that the murder law has been upheld in today’s judgment in the Nicklinson and Lamb euthanasia cases.

However, the majority judgment in the case of the anonymous third man, ‘Martin’, is deeply disturbing. Commenting on this, Paul Tully, SPUC Pro-Life’s general secretary, said: “If implemented it could encourage the pro-euthanasia lobby to recruit paid medical and legal professionals to organise the suicides of suffering and disabled people. The majority judges have done a disservice to disabled people by suggesting that the DPP’s prosecution guidance for assisted suicide should be amended based on Martin’s situation.

“This is the kind of outcome that pro-euthanasia campaigners were seeking, and it is clear that if it is put into effect, many more disabled people could be channelled towards assisted suicide”, Mr Tully said.

The present prosecution guidance has been criticised by disability rights groups for being too lax. Low prosecution statistics suggest that it is in need of tightening, rather than further relaxation. However, despite the DPP’s reluctance to bring prosecutions for criminally assisted suicide in recent years, the number of cases, mainly abroad, has remained low. There is little to show for the huge media support and vast legal expenses incurred by the pro-euthanasia lobby.

Mr Tully also said: “The DPP’s published guidance omitted a highly contentious point, which had been included in a draft version, saying that disability in the victim would be a factor tending against prosecution of someone trying to help that person commit suicide. Many disability rights groups had objected to being singled out in this way.

“The guidance also holds that if any individual is involved in assisting suicide in a professional or paid capacity it should weigh in favour of prosecution.

“In the ‘Martin’ judgment, the court appears to challenge these elements of the policy, calling Martin a ‘paradigm’ instance of why this should be allowed.

“Care and support for severely disabled or paralysed people who express a wish to die should be shown in the same way as for those without disability – by practical expressions of solidarity with them, such as working to improve pain control. The truly compassionate response to people with severe disability means helping them overcome any sense of worthlessness, not confirming such feelings by unethically (and illegally) helping to kill them”, he concluded.

Paul Tully, SPUC Pro-Life’s general secretary, can be contacted on mobile 07939 178719 or 020 7820 3127. SPUC Pro-Life’s communications department can be contacted on:

  • email news@spuc.org.uk
  • mobile 07939 177683
  • direct dial landline 020 7820 3129
  • Twitter @spucprolife

To subscribe to SPUC’s email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2013

Recommended Posts
Contact Us

Send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Not readable? Change text. captcha txt